The recently published paper “Residual Risk: Benchmarking the Boom in Private Credit” by Hooke, Hu, and Imerman (HHI), which was featured by Bloomberg as a “Mark to Myth” study, found that private credit funds performed no better than public credit, and with higher risk due to uncertain pricing of loan principal near the end of fund life. Unfortunately, according to Cliffwater, “it is remarkably flawed in methodology, and its conclusions are erroneous.”
Cliffwater’s critique of private credit assumptions in “Residual Risk”

Downloads
Sorry but this content is only available to certain members. If you believe you have access, try logging in.
- Cliffwater-Research-Critique-of-Residual-Risk_Benchmarking-the-Boom-in-Private-Credit-Hooke-Hu-Imerman-Oct-21-2025.pdf 165 KB
Nice to see you again
WELCOME BACK
Sign in to access your account, manage your downloads, and explore all the features available to you.
Login Account
Enter your credentials to access your account and continue where you left off.