Custody Challenges for Loan Trading

The LSTA was pleased to present:

CUSTODY CHALLENGES FOR LOAN TRADING

The staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission has recently taken the position that registered investment advisers that trade loans and other assets, such as derivatives, that do not settle “delivery versus payment” (“DVP”), have custody of client assets under the Investment Advisers Act and therefore must comply with the requirements of the custody rule. While the Adviser’s Act custody rules do not apply to trades on behalf of CLOs or mutual funds, they do apply to trades on behalf of separately managed accounts or co-mingled accounts. The SEC’s attribution of custody to these assets would require registered advisers to engage auditors to conduct annual surprise audits. The LSTA has been engaged with the SEC staff in an attempt to persuade them that (i) the exercise of trading authority in the ordinary course of managing an advisory account should not be considered “custody,” and (ii) even if they do not change that view, surprise audits are unnecessary in the loan trading context because of all of the protections already built into the system.

The LSTA hosted a webinar on Tuesday, July 11th at 4PM to discuss (i) background on the custody rule; (ii) the SEC’s position vis a vis loans and other assets that do not settle DVP; (iii) the implications of that position; (iv) what the LSTA and others have been doing to date; (v) next steps; and (vi) how registered advisers should be thinking about this issue.

Members joined use for an expert discussion on the following topics:

  • What is “Custody?”
  • The SEC’s view that loan trading results in custody of customer assets
  • The implications of the SEC’s view
  • What is the LSTA doing?
  • Next steps
  • What should registered advisers be doing?

Speakers:
Amy Doberman, Partner, WilmerHale
Elliot Ganz, General Counsel, LSTA

cle-webcast_emailheader-january-2019.wide

Become a Member

Membership in the LSTA offers numerous benefits and opportunities. Chief among them is the opportunity to participate in the decision making process that ultimately establishes loan market standards, develops market practices, and influences the market’s direction.

View a list of all members.

Our Partners

cusip-global-services-vector-logo.svgFitch Group logoRefinitiv-(March-2019)SP-Global-Market-Intelligence

Search Results by Relevancy

SOFR Index (and Averages) are Coming!

he SOFR Index (and Averages) have created considerable buzz in the loan space. The good news: Last week, the New York Fed announced it would start publishing them on March 2nd. The bad news: Due to various loan idiosyncrasies, these tools – while still beneficial! – may be less useful than for other asset classes. We explain all below.

LSTA Newsletter – February 14, 2020

This week, we start off talking about how “loans as securities” might morph into “loans as direct loans”. On a related(ish) note, we also discuss direct lending trends. We dig into LBO trends, looking at now (2019) and then (2007). And, finally, we ponder the evolution to SOFR (and, specifically, cash spread adjustments).

LBOs: Less Leverage? More Flex!

An eternal question is “How do the current crop of leveraged loans compare to the 2007 vintage?” Today we have an answer. Covenant Review recently compared recent jumbo LBOs to their pre-crisis counterparts

Quarterly Bankruptcy Roundup

This week Rich Levin of Jenner & Block once again presented his quarterly review of recent court decisions of interest and importance to the lending and bankruptcy world.

LIBOR & SOFR: Spread Adjustments

Folks that know LIBOR is likely to end soon after December 2021 probably also know that SOFR, the likely replacement for USD loans, is a different kind of rate. While LIBOR theoretically includes an element of bank credit risk, SOFR is an overnight risk free rate.